CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2022; 6: (2) ; 117-120 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijcr.20220070.

Application study of leucorrhea test in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
细菌性阴道病诊断中白带检验的应用研究

作者: 高立峰 *

山西省太原市妇幼保健院 山西太原

*通讯作者: 高立峰,单位:山西省太原市妇幼保健院 山西太原;

发布时间: 2022-04-25 总浏览量: 562

摘要

目的 分析细菌阴道病(BV)诊断时应用白带检验的临床应用效果。方法 将2019年6月-2021年6月期间在我院接受诊治的阴道炎症患者抽取了64例并对其资料进行回顾性分析,所有患者均接受了白带常规检验和BV Set试剂盒检验,对比两种检验方式的诊断结果。结果 (1)两种检验方式的阳性检出率对比无明显差异,(P>0.05)。(2)患者镜检时线索细胞、念珠菌、阴道毛滴虫阳性率对比差异显著,(P<0.05)。(3)按患者阴道分泌物清洁度进行分组,Ⅰ-Ⅱ度组的BV阳性检出率明显低于Ⅲ-Ⅳ组,(P<0.05)。结论 在细菌性阴道病的临床诊断中将白带常规检验、BV Set试剂盒检验联合应用,可有效提高临床诊断结果的准确性。

关键词: 白带常规检验;BV Set试剂盒检验;细菌性阴道病;临床诊断

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of leucorrhea test in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV).
Methods: 64 patients with vaginal inflammation diagnosed and treated in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 were selected and their data were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were examined by leucorrhea routine test and BV Set kit test, and the diagnostic results of the two methods were compared.
Results: (1) there was no significant difference in the positive rate between the two methods (P > 0.05). (2) there were significant differences in the positive rates of clue cells, Candida and Trichomonas vaginalis during microscopic examination (P < 0.05). (3) according to the cleanliness of vaginal secretions, the positive rate of BV in group Ⅰ-Ⅱ was significantly lower than that in group Ⅲ-Ⅳ (P < 0.05).
Conclusion  : the combined application of leucorrhea routine test and BV Set kit test in the clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis can effectively improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis.

Key words: Routine Leucorrhea Test; BV Set Kit Test; Bacterial Vaginosis; Clinical Diagnosis

参考文献 References

[1] 宋予娟.阴道炎五联检与妇科白带十项联合检测在阴道炎诊断中的应用[J].临床研究,2019,27(6):48-49.

[2] 中华医学会妇产科学分会感染性疾病协作组.细菌性阴道病诊治指南(2021修订版)[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(1):3-6.

[3] 卢珍,沈涌海,王智毅.白带常规及BV三项检测在妊娠期妇女阴道感染诊断中的应用[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2019,29(1):52-53,58.

[4] 王姜琳,杨慧健,于修文,等.细菌性阴道病流行特点,危险因素及与支原体感染的关系探究[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(9): 1260-1263.

[5] 周鹏燕.白带常规检查与BVSet试剂盒诊断细菌性阴道病结果比较[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2018, 5(31): 30,32.

[6] 冯欧.细菌性阴道病诊断中白带检验的应用与结果研究[J].家庭医药.就医选药,2020,(7):375.

[7] 顾丽萍.探讨白带常规联合BV三项检测对检测妊娠女阴道微生态的临床价值[J].中国处方药, 2019, 17(12): 113-114.

[8] 缪雯婷,吴永春.3种临床检验方法检测细菌性阴道病的结果比较[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(4):556-558.

[9] 钟彩芬.细菌性阴道病诊断中白带检验的应用与结果研究[J].家庭医药•就医选药,2020,(6):381.

[10] 宋予娟.阴道炎五联检与妇科白带十项联合检测在阴道炎诊断中的应用[J].临床研究,2019,27(6):48-49.

[11] 缪雯婷,吴永春.3种临床检验方法检测细菌性阴道病的结果比较[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(4): 556-558. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2019.04.038.

引用本文

高立峰, 细菌性阴道病诊断中白带检验的应用研究[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2022; 6: (2) : 117-120.