Open Access Article
International Journal of Clinical Research. 2026; 10: (5) ; 192-194 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijcr.20260268.
Study on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided nerve block anesthesia in the treatment of clavicle fractures
超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折治疗中的有效性研究
作者:
潘文豪 *
墨江县中医医院麻醉科 云南普洱
*通讯作者:
潘文豪,单位:墨江县中医医院麻醉科 云南普洱 ;
发布时间: 2026-05-26 总浏览量: 143
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
摘要
目的 研究超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折治疗中的有效性。方法 观察对象为76例锁骨骨折患者,收治时间2024年12月至2025年11月,随机分组,采用超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉的患者纳入W组(n=38),采用传统的常规麻醉的患者纳入E组(n=38),研究比较W组与E组患者的身体指标、麻醉效果、镇静程度、不良反应发生率。结果 W组患者在动脉血氧饱和度、平均动脉压及心率方面均优于E组患者,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。W组完全苏醒时间远短于E组,躁动评分、疼痛评分远低于E组,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。W组患者的心率失常、呼吸抑制、低氧合发生率均显著低于E组,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折治疗中的有效性更高,值得广泛利用。
关键词: 超声;神经阻滞麻醉;锁骨骨折;麻醉效果;镇静程度
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided nerve block anesthesia in the treatment of clavicle fractures. Methods The observation subjects were 76 patients with clavicle fractures, admitted from December 2024 to November 2025, randomly divided into two groups. Patients who received ultrasound-guided nerve block anesthesia were included in Group W (n=38), and patients who received traditional conventional anesthesia were included in Group E (n=38). The study compared the physical indicators, anesthesia effect, sedation level, and incidence of adverse reactions between Group W and Group E. Results Patients in Group W exhibited significantly better arterial oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate compared to those in Group E (P<0.05). The time to full recovery in Group W was markedly shorter than in Group E, with significantly lower agitation scores and pain scores (P<0.05). Additionally, the incidence of arrhythmia, respiratory depression, and hypoxia in Group W was significantly lower than in Group E (P<0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound guided nerve block anesthesia is more effective in the treatment of clavicle fractures and is worthy of widespread use.
Key words: Ultrasound; Nerve block anesthesia; Clavicle fracture; Anesthesia effect; Calmness level
参考文献 References
[1] 刘宇波. 超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折治疗中的临床效果 [J]. 中国医药科学, 2025, 15 (11): 151-154.
[2] 聂庆建. 超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折手术治疗中的应用效果及对患者认知功能的影响分析 [J]. 基层医学论坛, 2024, 28 (33): 24-27.
[3] 胡弹琴. 超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折内固定手术中的麻醉效果研究 [J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2024, 30 (20): 69-71.
[4] 章志祥. 超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞麻醉在上肢骨折患者手术中的应用效果 [J]. 中国社区医师, 2024, 40 (17): 59-61.
[5] 王政,许旭,濮颖秋,等. 超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞麻醉在肱骨干骨折内固定治疗患者中的应用效果 [J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2023, 8 (27): 86-89.
[6] 张晓君. 超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折治疗中的效果评价 [J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2023, 29 (09): 144-146.
[7] 曹为民. 超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折内固定术中的临床应用价值 [J]. 吉林医学, 2021, 42 (09): 2246 -2248.
[8] 张灵召,张明超. 超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞麻醉在重症老年患者上肢骨折手术中的应用体会 [J]. 临床医学, 2021, 41 (05): 66-67.
引用本文
潘文豪, 超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在锁骨骨折治疗中的有效性研究[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2026; 10: (5) : 192-194.