摘要
目的 基于3D生物打印构建鼻咽癌微球体模型并分析该模型对免疫治疗药物的响应情况,以期为临床制定个性化治疗计划和方案提供指导。方法 通过3D生物打印技术构建含有免疫细胞与肿瘤细胞的复杂微球体模型,将未经处理的微球体模型归入至对照组,将添加PD-1抗体的微球体模型归入至PD-1抗体组,将添加CTLA-4抗体的微球体模型归入至CTLA-4模型,将同时添加PD-1抗体与CTLA-4抗体的微球体模型归入至联合组。通过体内实验验证基于3D生物打印的鼻咽癌微球体模型对免疫治疗药物的响应,将未经处理的人源化小鼠归入至对照组,将接受PD-1抗体的小鼠归入至PD-1抗体组,将接受CTLA-4抗体的小鼠归入至CTLA-4抗体组,将同时接受PD-1抗体与CTLA-4抗体的小鼠归入至联合组。分析各组体外实验结果及体内实验结果。结果 与PD-1抗体组、CTLA-4抗体组及联合组相比,对照组鼻咽癌细胞及PMBCs细胞G0/G1期占比、细胞凋亡率更第,PD-L1、CD8+键蛋白表达水平及TNF-α、IL-2、IFN-γ及肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-2(IL-2)、干扰素γ(IFN-γ)水平更高(P<0.05),与联合组相比,PD-1抗体组、CTLA-4抗体组鼻咽癌细胞及PMBCs细胞G0/G1期占比、细胞凋亡率更低,PD-L1、CD8+及TNF-α、IL-2、IFN-γ表达水平更高(P<0.05)。PD-1抗体组、CTLA-4抗体组不同时间肿瘤体积均小于对照组,联合组不同时间肿瘤体积均小于对照组及PD-1抗体组、CTLA-4抗体组(P<0.05)。对照组CD45、CD8+表达水平高于PD-1抗体组、CTLA-4抗体组及合组(P<0.05),联合组CD45、CD8+表达水平低于PD-1抗体组、CTLA-4抗体组,CD4+表达水平高于PD-1抗体组、CTLA-4抗体组(P<0.05)。结论 通过3D生物打印构建鼻咽癌微球体模型可对免疫治疗药物响应情况进行准确评估,能够为临床合理选择治疗药物提供指导。
关键词: 鼻咽癌;3D生物打印;鼻咽癌微球体模型;免疫治疗药物;响应情况
Abstract
Objective To construct a nasopharyngeal carcinoma microsphere model based on 3D bioprinting and analyze its response to immunotherapy drugs, aiming to provide guidance for the development of personalized treatment plans and protocols in clinical practice. Methods Complex microsphere models containing immune cells and tumor cells were constructed using 3D bioprinting technology. Untreated microsphere models were assigned to the control group, microsphere models with added PD-1 antibody were assigned to the PD-1 antibody group, microsphere models with added CTLA-4 antibody were assigned to the CTLA-4 model group, and microsphere models with added PD-1 and CTLA-4 antibodies were assigned to the combined group. In vivo experiments were conducted to verify the response of a 3D bioprinted nasopharyngeal carcinoma microsphere model to immunotherapy drugs. Untreated humanized mice were assigned to the control group, mice receiving PD-1 antibody were assigned to the PD-1 antibody group, mice receiving CTLA-4 antibody were assigned to the CTLA-4 antibody group, and mice receiving both PD-1 and CTLA-4 antibodies were assigned to the combination group. The in vitro and in vivo experimental results for each group were analyzed. Results Compared with the PD-1 antibody group, CTLA-4 antibody group, and combination group, the control group had a lower proportion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and PMBCs in the G0/G1 phase, a lower apoptosis rate, and higher levels of PD-L1, CD8+ bond protein expression, TNF-α, IL-2, IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (P<0.05). Compared with the combination group, the PD-1 antibody group and CTLA-4 antibody group had a lower proportion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and PMBCs in the G0/G1 phase, a lower apoptosis rate, and higher levels of PD-L1, CD8+, TNF-α, IL-2, and IFN-γ expression (P<0.05). The tumor volume in the PD-1 antibody group and CTLA-4 antibody group was smaller than that in the control group at different time points, while the tumor volume in the combination group was smaller than that in the control group, the PD-1 antibody group, and the CTLA-4 antibody group at different time points (P<0.05). The expression levels of CD45 and CD8+ in the control group were higher than those in the PD-1 antibody group, CTLA-4 antibody group, and the combined group (P<0.05). In the combined group, the expression levels of CD45 and CD8+ were lower than those in the PD-1 antibody group and CTLA-4 antibody group, while the expression level of CD4+ was higher than that in the PD-1 antibody group and CTLA-4 antibody group (P<0.05). Conclusion Constructing a nasopharyngeal carcinoma microsphere model using 3D bioprinting can accurately assess the response to immunotherapy drugs, providing guidance for the rational selection of treatment drugs in clinical practice.
Key words: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; 3D bioprinting; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma microsphere model; Immunotherapy drugs; Response
参考文献 References
[1] Bray F,Laversanne M,Sung H,et al.Global cancer statistics 2022:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2024,74(3):229-263.
[2] Sharma R,Restan PM,Dasilva VA,et al.3D bioprinting comples models of cancer[J].Biomater Sci,2023,11(10): 3414-3430.
[3] Cheng SN,Li YX,Yu CG,et al.3D bioprinted tumou-=vesel-bone co-culture scafffold for breast cancer bone metastasis modeling and drug testing[J].Chem Eng J,2023,476: 146685.
[4] 刘畅,胡雪峰.3D生物打印技术及其应用[J].生物学教学,2023,48(2):4-7.
[5] 邵静,魏鑫鑫,范栩嫚.鼻咽原发肿瘤微环境中免疫反应对鼻咽癌预后的影响[J].实验与检验医学,2023,41(4): 526-529.
[6] 裴玉,唐春慧.鼻咽癌同步放化疗治疗进程中免疫微环境变化及其与预后的关系[J].中国免疫学杂志,2025,41(4): 931-937.
[7] 刘腾,肖磊,韦波,等. 单、双指数模型扩散加权成像及动脉自旋标记预测复发性鼻咽癌近期疗效的应用价值[J]. 磁共振成像,2023,14(9):63-69.
[8] 刘一帆,保莎莎,徐男,等. 单、双指数模型快速自旋回波扩散加权成像在T1期鼻咽癌与淋巴组织增生鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志,2022,38(9):1410-1414.
[9] 刘新菊,刘冬梅,邱荣良. 综合治疗对局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效及对外周血PD-1、sE-cad和免疫功能的影响[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志,2024,16(4):661-664,669.
[10] 徐歆宇,赵朝芬,贺前勇,等. 外周血PD-1、CTLA-4、T-reg、pDC与鼻咽癌患者临床特征及疗效的相关性[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2024,32(1):53-60.
[11] 张再兴,贾玉静. CTLA-4、FOXP3在鼻咽癌中的表达及临床价值[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2023,26(5):456-460.
[12] 高婧婧,宗丹,徐婧姝,等. 抗血管生成药物联合PD-1抑制剂及化疗对晚期鼻咽癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2025,45(7):963-972.
[13] 包俊杰,刘立志,樊卫,等. 晚期鼻咽癌患者基线 18F-FDG PET/CT代谢参数预测免疫治疗效果及预后的价值[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2025,45(3):138-143.
[14] 吴晓峰,赵建红,李思维,等. 基于临床生化参数识别p16阴性鼻咽癌同步放化疗联合诱导化疗候选老年人群的列线图模型构建[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2025, 32(7):432-438.
[15] 俞璐璐,万晶,葛宜枝,等. 鼻咽癌放化疗治疗患者外周血PD-1及免疫指标水平的变化及其临床意义[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2024,23(12):1324-1327.
[16] 朱绍元,叶远梅,徐歆宇,等. 局部晚期鼻咽癌患者诱导化疗联合同期放化疗治疗前后外周血免疫相关指标的变化和意义[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗,2024,37(9):757-766.
[17] 严颐丹,刘利,赵灵逸,等. 一项单中心回顾性研究:真实世界中PD-1抑制剂在晚期癌症患者免疫治疗中的有效性和安全性[J]. 肿瘤,2023,43(3):161-170.
[18] 李霞,李锦,龚华松,等. 外周血免疫细胞亚型及PD-1表达对鼻咽癌患者免疫状态评估及治疗的指导价值[J]. 重庆医学,2023,52(8):1166-1170,1176.
[19] 王瑞莲,谭锦云,卢梓荣,等. 鼻咽癌患者经调强放疗序贯抗PD-1免疫治疗后甲状腺功能减退的影响因素[J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(16):2114-2118.
[20] 林冰,周平,刘沙,等. 吉西他滨联合顺铂联合程序性细胞死亡受体1抗体免疫治疗转移性鼻咽癌有效性及安全性分析[J]. 临床军医杂志,2022,50(6):642-644,648.