Research on the effect of core strength training on the rehabilitation of chronic lower back pain patients
核心力量训练对慢性下腰痛患者康复效果的作用研究

摘要

目的 探讨核心力量训练对慢性下腰痛患者康复效果的作用。方法 本次研究在2025年1月-2025年10月期间选择了66例慢性下腰痛患者进行对照研究，对照组患者采用常规训练方式，观察组采用核心力量训练方式，以此比较两组患者训练后的效果和各项指标变化情况。结果 两组数据显示观察组患者的VAS评分下降趋势显著，改善效果更明显，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；比较两组患者干预前后JOA评分，发现观察组患者干预前JOA评分为6.42±1.32分，对照组为6.38±1.28分，两组无显著差异，不具有统计学意义（P＞0.05）；干预后观察组的JOA评分为2.15±0.59分，对照组为4.09±0.98分。两组患者进行干预后，显然观察组患者的腰椎功能恢复更加明显，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；从数据中得知观察组患者在干预后的康复总有效率更高，表示康复效果更佳，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 通过对照研究发现，常规康复训练虽然能够缓解患者的症状，但核心力量训练下的慢性下腰痛患者的康复效果更具显著，能够恢复患者的腰椎功能，值得临床推广。

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of core strength training on the rehabilitation of patients with chronic lower back pain.
Methods This study selected 66 patients with chronic low back pain from January 2025 to October 2025 for a controlled study. All cases were diagnosed as chronic low back pain patients in our department. The control group received conventional training methods, while the observation group received core strength training methods. The effects and changes in various indicators of the two groups of patients after training were compared.
Results Two sets of data showed that the VAS scores of the observation group patients showed a significant downward trend, with a more significant improvement effect, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); Comparing the JOA scores of two groups of patients before and after intervention, it was found that the observation group had a JOA score of 6.42 ± 1.32 points before intervention, while the control group had a JOA score of 6.38 ± 1.28 points. There was no significant difference between the two groups, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); After intervention, the JOA score of the observation group was 2.15 ± 0.59 points, while the control group was 4.09 ± 0.98 points. After intervention, it was evident that the observation group had a more significant recovery of lumbar spine function, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05); From the data, it was found that the observation group had a higher overall effective rate of rehabilitation after intervention, indicating better rehabilitation outcomes, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Through comparative studies, it has been found that although conventional rehabilitation training can alleviate patients' symptoms, the rehabilitation effect of chronic low back pain patients under core strength training is more significant, which can restore patients' lumbar spine function and is worthy of clinical promotion.