CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2026; 10: (1) ; 86-88 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijcr.20260023.

Analysis of the effect of combined spinal epidural block on pain relief during childbirth in pregnant women
腰麻-硬膜外结合阻滞在孕妇分娩镇痛中的效果分析

作者: 谷茂林 *

北京优联医院 北京

*通讯作者: 谷茂林,单位:北京优联医院 北京;

发布时间: 2026-01-30 总浏览量: 26

摘要

目的 探讨腰麻-硬膜外麻醉结合阻滞麻醉对于缓解孕妇分娩镇痛的效果。方法 样本对象为80例于2023年1月至2024年2月期间在本院分娩的孕妇,根据选择的镇痛模式分组,接受连续硬膜外麻醉的30例定义为对照组,接受腰麻-硬膜外结合阻滞的50例定义为观察组,观察两组的生命体征、镇痛效果以及产程情况。结果 观察组麻醉后的心率和血氧值均优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的第1、2、3产程疼痛程度轻于对照组,时间短于对照组;观察组和对照组剖宫产率分别为14.00%及20.00%。结论 孕妇分娩镇痛时,使用腰麻-硬膜外结合阻滞麻醉的方式效果显著,并能够有效缩短产程,值得推荐使用。

关键词: 分娩镇痛;腰麻-硬膜外结合阻滞;VAS

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of epidural anesthesia combined with block anesthesia on relieving pain during childbirth in pregnant women.
Methods The sample subjects were 80 pregnant women who gave birth in our hospital between January 2023 and February 2024 According to the selected analgesia mode, they were divided into two groups: 30 who received continuous epidural anesthesia were defined as the control group, and 50 who received combined spinal epidural block were defined as the observation group. The vital signs, analgesic effect, and labor process of the two groups were observed.
Results The heart rate and blood oxygen levels of the observation group after anesthesia were better than those of the control group (P < 0.05); the degree of pain during the first, second, and third stages of labor in the observation group was less than that in the control group, and the duration was shorter than that in the control group; the cesarean section rates of the observation group and the control group were 14.00% and 20.00%, respectively.
Conclusion   The use of lumbar epidural combined anesthesia for pain relief during childbirth in pregnant women is significantly effective and can effectively shorten the labor process, and is recommended for use.

Key words: Labor analgesia; Combined spinal epidural block; VAS

参考文献 References

[1] 钮铮.不同浓度舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因在无痛分娩中的镇痛效果比较[J].中国医学创新,2025,22(20):108-111.

[2] HORVATH B, KLOESEL B, TODD MM, et al. The evolution, current value, and future of the american society of anesthesiologists physical status classification system[J]. Anesthesiology, 2021, 135(5): 904-919.

[3] 尹军,徐向钊,徐淑兰,等.舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因腰硬联合麻醉在初产妇分娩镇痛中的临床观察 [J]. 健康必读,2020,18(8):67.

[4] 郑西龙.罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞麻醉在分娩镇痛中的临床应用效果分析[J].智慧健康, 2021,7(10):105-107.

[5] 王健,王茹.腰硬联合麻醉分娩镇痛对孕妇血清皮质醇、胃肠反应及妊娠结局的影响[J].生命科学仪器,2025, 23(01): 162-164.

[6] 雷燕霞,贺艳兰,肖燕.硬膜外分娩镇痛冲击量给药联合以改良腰麻侧卧位为主的待产体位应用于妊娠期糖尿病产妇的效果[J].智慧健康,2022,8(31):101-104.

[7] 郜书杰,张新鹏,左威.腰硬联合麻醉复合硬膜外镇痛对高血压产妇血压水平及镇痛效果的影响[J].中外医疗, 2025,44(2):10-13.

[8] 易兰.腰麻及硬膜外麻醉联合应用于分娩镇痛的临床效果[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2021,31(01):157-158.


引用本文

谷茂林, 腰麻-硬膜外结合阻滞在孕妇分娩镇痛中的效果分析[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2026; 10: (1) : 86-88.