摘要
目的 对骨性Ⅲ类错牙合患者中施以无托槽隐形矫治器结合支抗钉治疗方式的价值进行明确,旨在推动骨性Ⅲ类错牙合治疗研究发展。方法 以2022年2月至2025年2月期间院内临床综合诊断为骨性Ⅲ类错牙合的40例患者作为试验观察对象,试验分组按照随机数字表法进行,包括对照组(20例)、观察组(20例),不同小组治疗模式分别以单一无托槽隐形矫治器治疗手段、无托槽隐形矫治器结合支抗钉手段开展,分析两组疗效。结果 经组间数据比较,对比的对象之间结果P<0.05,表现出显著差异,疗效方面表示观察组更佳;治疗中与治疗后对比的对象之间结果P<0.05,表现出显著差异,牙近远中距离和角度、颊舌向距离和角度、垂直向移动距离和角度方面表示观察组均更佳,治疗后对比的对象之间结果P<0.05,表现出显著差异,牙根长度方面表示观察组更长。结论 于骨性Ⅲ类错牙合中施以无托槽隐形矫治器结合支抗钉治疗方式,对提高疗效有着重要意义,可改善牙近远中距离和角度、颊舌向距离和角度、垂直向移动距离和角度与牙根长度。
关键词: 骨性Ⅲ类错牙合;无托槽隐形矫治器;支抗钉;牙根
Abstract
Objective To clarify the value of using non bracket invisible orthodontic appliances combined with anchorage nails in the treatment of Class III malocclusion, with the aim of promoting the research and development of treatment for Class III malocclusion. Methods A total of 40 patients diagnosed with Class III malocclusion clinically in the hospital between February 2022 and February 2025 were selected as the experimental observation subjects. The experimental groups were randomly divided into a control group (20 cases) and an observation group (20 cases). The treatment modes of different groups were carried out using a single non bracket invisible orthodontic appliance or a combination of non bracket invisible orthodontic appliance and anchorage nail. The efficacy of the two groups was analyzed. Results The results of the inter group data comparison showed a significant difference (P<0.05) among the compared subjects, indicating that the observation group had better therapeutic effects; The results between the subjects compared during and after treatment showed significant differences (P<0.05), with the observation group showing better distances and angles in the mesial and distal directions of teeth, buccal and lingual directions, and vertical movement distances and angles. The results between the subjects compared after treatment showed significant differences (P<0.05), with the observation group showing longer root lengths. Conclusion The use of non bracket invisible orthodontic appliances combined with anchorage nails in the treatment of Class III malocclusion is of great significance in improving the therapeutic effect. It can improve the distance and angle between the teeth in the mesial and distal directions, the distance and angle between the buccal and lingual directions, the vertical movement distance and angle, and the length of the tooth root.
Key words: Class III malocclusion of bone; Invisible orthodontic appliance without brackets; Supporting nail; Tooth root
参考文献 References
[1] 孟芊娇,吴建华,程慧欣,等.传动矫治技术治疗骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)畸形的疗效分析[J].中国医疗美容,2025, 15(08): 128-133.
[2] 张容秀,徐丽,刘芳,等.上颌前方牵引联合快速扩弓治疗骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)对颊旁间隙及微笑美学的影响[J].口腔医学,2025,45(08):585-589.
[3] 曾宇,王晓璇,张茂奇,等.改良牙周辅助加速成骨正畸术辅助治疗骨性Ⅱ类错(牙合)畸形1例[J].口腔医学研究,2025,41(08):727-732.
[4] 左常艳,郑之峻,刘曙,等. 微型种植钉支抗对不同性别骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形患者侧貌与面部美学的影响[J]. 广州医科大学学报,2021,49(6):68-71,75.
[5] 朱明敏,陈萍,袁学进.锥形束CT测量对骨性Ⅲ类错牙合患者正畸治疗后牙槽骨形态变化的临床价值研究[J].中国医学装备,2025,22(02):54-58.
[6] 王佳岱,李炜琦,陈昊,等.Ⅲ期B级牙周炎伴骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)畸形多学科联合治疗1例[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2025,30(01):28-34.
[7] 熊再道,张燕萍,顾永春,等.无托槽隐形矫治器掩饰治疗成人骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)的牙根吸收研究[J].口腔医学,2024,44(11):847-850+870.
[8] 马福娟,瞿亚宁,杨天梅,等. 无托槽隐形矫治器掩饰性治疗成人骨性Ⅲ类错1例[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志,2025, 39(2):170-173,134.
[9] 程晗,张慧敏,范亚茹.数字化技术辅助BSSRO治疗骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)畸形对髁突位置影响的临床分析[J].中国医药指南,2025,23(13):45-49.
[10] 王明杰,罗惠方,向征,等. 种植钉支抗技术在成人骨性安氏Ⅲ类错合掩饰性矫正中的应用一例分析[J]. 山东医学高等专科学校学报,2024,46(5):44-45,封3.
[11] 李子煜,曹斐然,吴贝贝,等. 牙支抗式与骨支抗式矫治早期骨性Ⅲ类错畸形的效果比较[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志,2024,40(1):109-116.
[12] 杨璐,王斌. 无托槽隐形矫治技术在骨性Ⅲ类错颌中的临床应用研究[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2022,43(1):36-41.
[13] 周志浩,熊再道,顾永春,等. 无托槽隐形矫治器与固定矫治器对成人骨性Ⅲ类错掩饰治疗的对比研究[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志,2023,32(2):104-108,146.
[14] 马艳宁,强茹月,金作林. 无托槽隐形矫治器联合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错 的三维有限元研究 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志,2024,59(9):919-926.
[15] 林杭,黄泽红,林清华,等. 无托槽隐形矫治器结合支抗钉治疗骨性Ⅲ类错牙合的临床效果[J]. 中国医疗美容, 2024,14(7):92-95.