A comparative study on the efficacy and postoperative recovery of single-port and traditional three-port thoracoscopic treatments for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer
单孔胸腔镜与传统三孔胸腔镜治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及术后恢复情况对比研究

摘要

目的 探讨对临床罹患早期非小细胞肺癌者，采取单孔胸腔镜vs传统三孔胸腔镜治疗，分析比照其疗效。方法 2023年1月-2025年1月对我院收入的80例早期非小细胞肺癌者实施抽取，遵照随机数字表法分为2小组，对照组以及观察组，每组40例患者；分别落实传统三孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术治疗、单孔胸腔镜治疗。结果 观察组围术期指标更优（P<0.05）。术后疼痛状况显示，观察组均低于对照组（P<0.05）。2组并发症落实汇总，凸显观察组更低导向（P<0.05）。结论 对临床罹患早期非小细胞肺癌者，较传统三孔胸腔镜治疗，采取单孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术治疗更具效果。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of single-port thoracoscopic versus traditional three-port thoracoscopic treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Methods A total of 80 early-stage NSCLC patients admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to January 2025 were randomly divided into two groups using a randomized number table method, with 40 patients in each group (control and observation). The two groups received either traditional three-port thoracoscopic radical resection or single-port thoracoscopic treatment respectively.
Results The observation group demonstrated superior perioperative outcomes (P<0.05). Postoperative pain levels were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). A comprehensive analysis of complications between the two groups revealed a marked reduction in complications in the observation group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   For clinical early non-small cell lung cancer patients, radical lung cancer treatment with single hole thoracoscopy is more effective than traditional three-hole thoracoscopy.