CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2025; 9: (7) ; 136-138 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijcr.20250350.

Study on the clinical therapeutic effect of emergency severe pneumonia complicated with septic shock
急诊重症肺炎合并感染性休克临床治疗效果研究

作者: 郝燕 *

乌海市人民医院 内蒙古乌海

*通讯作者: 郝燕,单位:乌海市人民医院 内蒙古乌海;

发布时间: 2025-07-26 总浏览量: 35

摘要

目的 研究急诊重症肺炎合并感染性休克患者的临床治疗方案及效果。方法 随机选取我院急诊接收的重症肺炎患者68例,以随机数字表法将入选的病例分成观察组34例和对照组34例,对照组给予头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠治疗,观察组在对照组用药基础上添加美罗培南治疗,分析对比两组治疗效果。结果 观察组患者的症状改善、机械通气和住院所用时间短于对照组,患者体内炎性因子水平与对照组相比显著降低,最终获得的治疗总有效率高于对照组,并发症发生率低于对照组,(P<0.05)。结论 对急诊重症肺炎合并感染性休克患者采取头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠联合美罗培南方案治疗,可获得更加理想的治疗效果,尽早改善患者临床症状,降低体内炎性因子水平,减少并发症发生。

关键词: 急诊重症肺炎;感染性休克;治疗方案;效果研究

Abstract

Objective To study the clinical treatment plan and effect of emergency patients with severe pneumonia complicated with septic shock.
Methods A total of 68 patients with severe pneumonia admitted to the emergency department of our hospital were randomly selected. The selected cases were divided into an observation group of 34 cases and a control group of 34 cases by the random number table method. The control group was treated with cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium, and the observation group was treated with meropenem in addition to the medication of the control group. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were analyzed and compared.
Results The symptom improvement, mechanical ventilation and hospitalization time of patients in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group. The levels of inflammatory factors in the patients' bodies were significantly lower than those in the control group. The total effective rate of treatment finally obtained was higher than that in the control group, and the incidence of complications was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   For emergency patients with severe pneumonia complicated with septic shock, the treatment regimen of cefoperazone sodium sulbactam sodium combined with meropenem can achieve more ideal therapeutic effects, improve the clinical symptoms of patients as soon as possible, reduce the levels of inflammatory factors in the body, and reduce the occurrence of complications.

Key words: Emergency severe pneumonia; Infectious shock; Treatment plan; Effect research

参考文献 References

[1] 张春媚,张红伟,王帅等.血必净联合哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在重症肺炎治疗中的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2022,42 (9): 2128-2131.

[2] 金春雨,刘自新.急诊重症肺炎合并感染性休克临床治疗效果研究[J].中外医疗,2023,42(33):43-46. 

[3] 彭强,王蕾,成浩,等.急诊重症肺炎合并感染性休克临床治疗效果分析[J].保健文汇,2023,24(34):33-36. 

[4] 急诊重症肺炎并感染性休克死亡的影响因素分析[J].中国医药指南,2022,20(16):14-17.

[5] 王红杰.美罗培南用于急诊重症肺炎并发感染性休克治疗的临床效果[J].现代养生,2024,24(18):1373-1375. 

[6] 卢必成.急诊重症肺炎并发感染性休克的临床分析与探讨[J].中文科技期刊数据库(文摘版)医药卫生,2022, 20(9): 103-105.

[7] 李泽暄,陈新光,汤子鸣,等.急诊重症肺炎并发感染性休克的临床特点及相关影响因素分析[J].中国病原生物学杂志,2024,19(6):720-723,728.

[8] 吕益.急诊重症肺炎患者感染性休克的临床分析及干预对策[J].健康必读,2021, 15(12):226-227.

引用本文

郝燕, 急诊重症肺炎合并感染性休克临床治疗效果研究[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2025; 9: (7) : 136-138.