CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2025; 9: (7) ; 81-84 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijcr.20250334.

Analysis of the efficacy of tenecteplase and alteplase in thrombolytic treatment of acute cerebral infarction
替奈普酶与阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的疗效分析

作者: 张岩 *

哈密市中心医院 新疆哈密

*通讯作者: 张岩,单位:哈密市中心医院 新疆哈密;

发布时间: 2025-07-26 总浏览量: 35

摘要

目的 分析阿替普酶(rt-PA)溶栓、替奈普酶(TNK))溶栓治疗急性脑梗死(ACI)的效用。方法 2024年2月~2025年2月,取我院ACI 112例患者,纳入标准:ACI确诊患者;起病时间应少于4.5h;NIHSS<20分。排除标准:存在脑出血体征;心血管严重病症;凝血功能障碍;近期实施外科手术治疗。均等随机分组,各组均56例,对照组+ rt-PA溶栓,观察组+ TNK溶栓,分析组间疗效。结果 治疗后,组间生化指标、NIHSS(美国国立卫生研究院脑卒中量表)评分、MBI(Barthel 指数分级法)评分(P>0.05);观察组疗效、不良反应均较对照组更优(P<0.05)。结论 ACI患者行TNK、rt-PA 溶栓均利于神经、凝血功能改善,日常活动能力提高,对比rt-PA 溶栓,TNK溶栓价值更为有效、安全、方便。

关键词: 急性脑梗死;不良反应;替奈普酶;疗效;阿替普酶

Abstract

Objective To analyze the efficacy of thrombolysis with alteplase (rt-PA) and Teneplase (TNK) in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction (ACI).
Methods From February, 2024 to February, 2025, 112 patients with ACI in our hospital were selected, and the inclusion criteria were: confirmed patients with ACI; The onset time should be less than 4.5h; NIHSS<20 points. Exclusion criteria: there are signs of cerebral hemorrhage; Serious cardiovascular diseases; Coagulation dysfunction; Surgical treatment was performed recently. Randomly and equally, 56 cases in each group, the control group+RT-PA thrombolysis, the observation group+TNK thrombolysis, and the curative effect between groups was analyzed.
Results After treatment, biochemical indexes, NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score and MBI(Barthel Index Classification) score between groups (P>0.05); The curative effect and adverse reactions of the observation group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Thrombolysis with TNK and rt-PA in ACI patients is beneficial to the improvement of nerve and coagulation function and the ability of daily activities. Compared with rt-PA thrombolysis, TNK is more effective, safe and convenient.

Key words: Acute cerebral infarction; Adverse reactions; Tenecteplase; Therapeutic effect; Alteplase

参考文献 References

[1] 韦家俊,梁炯. 神经介入联合阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的效果及对患者预后的影响[J]. 大医生,2025, 10(3):54-56. 

[2] 杜娟,周晓雨,张淼,等. Solitaire支架机械取栓结合双重抗血小板治疗对急性脑梗死患者肢体功能和血管再闭塞的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2024,40(14):1952-1956. 

[3] 解鑫瑜,崔俊雷,杜大勇,等. 替罗非班在急性大血管闭塞性脑梗死机械取栓治疗中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2024,40(12):1239-1245. 

[4] 钟传飘. 替罗非班抗栓治疗在急性脑梗死机械取栓中的应用及对近期预后的影响[D]. 广州医科大学,2023.

[5] 夏希. 依达拉奉右莰醇联合丁苯酞治疗急性脑梗死的疗效及对患者神经功能的影响[J]. 现代医学与健康研究(电子版),2025,9(2):68-70. 

[6] 李培圣,曾国芳,陈海,等. 数字减影血管造影引导介入取栓联合替罗非班抗栓治疗在急性脑梗死中的应用效果[J]. 现代医学与健康研究(电子版),2025,9(2):83-85. 

[7] 仵赵瑶,段菁,刘定斌. 盐酸罂粟碱注射液联合阿替普酶静脉溶栓对于发病<4.5h急性脑梗死治疗的近期效果及安全性研究[J]. 四川生理科学杂志,2024,46(10):2195-2197.

[8] 付飞,樊飞. 醒脑开窍针刺法合并补肾化痰活血方治疗急性脑梗死风痰瘀阻证的临床研究[J]. 中医药学报,2025, 53(1):83-87.

引用本文

张岩, 替奈普酶与阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的疗效分析[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2025; 9: (7) : 81-84.