Open Access Article
International Journal of Clinical Research. 2025; 9: (5) ; 191-191 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijcr.20250271.
Correction: Comparison of the effects of conventional drainage tube and indwelling pigtail drainage catheter after thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lower lobes
作者勘误:胸腔镜下肺下叶楔形切除术后普通引流管与留置猪尾引流导管的效果对比
作者:
毛宇 *,
黎明,
乔文婷,
周辰菲
内蒙古呼和浩特市第一医院胸外科 内蒙古呼和浩特
*通讯作者:
毛宇,单位:内蒙古呼和浩特市第一医院胸外科 内蒙古呼和浩特;
发布时间: 2025-05-30 总浏览量: 52
PDF 全文下载
引用本文
摘要
【说明】“胸腔镜下肺下叶楔形切除术后普通引流管与留置猪尾引流导管的效果对比”文章因作者姓名有误申请内容更正,编委会与编辑部现按国际出版要求予以声明:
【文章名】胸腔镜下肺下叶楔形切除术后普通引流管与留置猪尾引流导管的效果对比
【总页数】3页(P11-P13)
【原文内容】周晨菲
【修改内容】周辰菲
关键词: 勘误
Abstract
[Explanation] The article "Comparison of the effects of ordinary drainage tubes and indwelling pigtail drainage catheters after thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lower lobes" has applied for content correction due to an error in the author's name. The editorial board and editorial department now declare in accordance with international publishing requirements:
[Title] Comparison of the effects of ordinary drainage tubes and indwelling pigtail drainage catheters after thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lower lobes
[Total Pages] 3 pages (P11-P13)
[Original content] Zhou Chenfei
[Modified content] Zhou Chenfei
Key words: Correction
参考文献 References
引用本文
毛宇, 黎明, 乔文婷, 周辰菲, 作者勘误:胸腔镜下肺下叶楔形切除术后普通引流管与留置猪尾引流导管的效果对比[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2025; 9: (5) : 191-191.