The comparison of papillary lesion and pathological examination
乳腺乳头状病变的穿刺与切除病理检查效果对比

摘要

目的 分析乳腺乳头状病变的穿刺与切除病理检查效果。方法 2022年6月-2024年6月期间，本院接诊70例乳腺乳头状病变患者，随机均分两组。试验和对照组各35人，试验组采取切除病理检查，对照组采取穿刺活检，对所有患者的临床资料及最终检查效果进行回顾性分析。结果 试验组的检出率为97.14%（34/35），对照组的检出率为88.57%（31/35）。可知，试验组的检查效果更好。关于满意度，试验组占比91.43%（32/35）；对照组占比82.86%（29/35）。可知，试验组的检查满意度更高。P＜0.05。结论 切除病理检查在乳腺乳头状病变的诊断中扮演着关键角色，其结果的准确性相对较高。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effect of puncture and resection of papillary breast lesions.
Methods From June 2022 to June 2024,70 breast nipple lesion patients were treated and randomly divided into two groups. There were 35 patients in the trial and the control group, with pathological examination by resection and needle biopsy in the control group. The clinical data and the final examination effect of all patients were retrospectively analyzed.
Results The detection rate in the test group was 97.14% (34 / 35), and the detection rate in the control group was 88.57% (31 / 35). It can be seen that the test effect of the test group is better. Regarding satisfaction, the test group accounted for 91.43% (32 / 35), and the control group accounted for 82.86% (29 / 35). It can be seen that the examination satisfaction was higher in the test group. P<0.05.
Conclusion   Excision pathological examination plays a key role in the diagnosis of papillary breast disease, and the accuracy of the results is relatively high.