CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2024; 8: (10) ; 115-117 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijcr.20240424.

The effect of high-frequency electrocoagulation resection under painlessgastroscopy on patients with gastric polyps
无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治疗胃息肉患者的效果

作者: 孙磊 *

保定兴芮医院 河北保定

*通讯作者: 孙磊,单位:保定兴芮医院 河北保定;

发布时间: 2024-10-30 总浏览量: 112

摘要

目的 分析无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治疗胃息肉的效果、临床表现及安全性。方法 选取2022-12至2023-12收治的胃息肉患者70例,随机均分为无痛组与常规组,分别行常规治疗及无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治疗,比较临床指标、成功率、复发率及并发症发生率。结果 与常规组比,无痛组临床指标数据较优、成功率较高(100.00%>82.86%)、复发率较低(2.86%<22.86%)、并发症发生率较低(0.00%<20.00%)。对比均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术可进一步促进胃息肉患者胃肠道功能恢复,且有较好治疗效果与安全性。

关键词: 无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术;胃息肉;临床指标;成功率;复发率;并发症发生率

Abstract

Objective To analyze the efficacy, clinical manifestations, and safety of high-frequency electrocoagulation resection under painless gastroscopy for the treatment of gastric polyps.
Methods 70 patients with gastric polyps admitted from December 2022 to December 2023 were randomly divided into a painless group and a conventional group. They were treated with conventional therapy and high-frequency electrocoagulation under painless gastroscopy, respectively. Clinical indicators, success rate, recurrence rate, and incidence of complications were compared.
Results Compared with the conventional group, the painless group had better clinical indicators, higher success rate (100.00%>82.86%), lower recurrence rate (2.86%<22.86%), and lower incidence of complications (0.00%<20.00%). The comparisons were statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusion   High frequency electrocoagulation under painless gastroscopy can further promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients with gastric polyps, and has good therapeutic effect and safety.

Key words: High frequency electrocoagulation resection under painless gastroscopy; Gastric polyps; Clinical indicators; Success rate; Recurrence rate; Incidence of complications

参考文献 References

[1] 冯正菱,李俊. 无痛消化内镜下高频电凝电切术对胃息肉患者围手术期指标的影响及安全性分析[J]. 中外医学研究,2024,22(3):45-48.

[2] 刘丽,李娜,王惠. 无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治疗胃息肉患者的效果及安全性[J]. 世界复合医学,2023,9(3):149-152.

[3] 李高贤. 无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治疗胃息肉[J]. 河南医学研究,2019,28(22):4079-4080.

[4] 林龙聪,张安平. 无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治疗胃息肉患者的短期随访效果[J]. 中外医学研究,2019,17(26):137-139.

[5] 曾玲. 无痛胃镜下高频电凝切术治疗胃息肉的临床疗效研究[J]. 中国社区医师,2020,36(32):20-21.

[6] 赵泽亚. 无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治疗64例胃息肉患者的短期随访研究[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2019,30(14): 2486-2488.

[7] 孔憶娜. 无痛胃镜高频电凝切除术治疗胃息肉的安全性及效果评价[J]. 系统医学,2019,4(22):52-54,57.

[8] 闵建平. 无痛胃镜下高频电凝电切术治疗胃息肉疗效观察[J]. 中国实用医药,2020,15(24):20-22.

[9] 中华医学会病理学分会消化疾病学组 . 胃肠道腺瘤和良性上皮性息肉的病理诊断共识 [J]. 中华病理学杂志,2020,49(1):3-11.

[10] 姜红建,韩文良,李小环,等 . 胃镜下氩离子凝固术与胃镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃息肉临床疗效比较 [J]. 新乡医学院学报,2021,38(2):166-168.

引用本文

孙磊, 无痛胃镜下高频电凝切除术治疗胃息肉患者的效果[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2024; 8: (10) : 115-117.