CSCIED

期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Clinical Research. 2024; 8: (9) ; 84-86 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijcr.20240357.

Comparison of the effects of argon ion coagulation under gastroscopy and mucosal resection under gastroscopy in the treatment of gastric polyps patients
胃镜下氩离子凝固术与胃镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃息肉患者的效果比较

作者: 孙磊 *

保定兴芮医院 河北保定

*通讯作者: 孙磊,单位:保定兴芮医院 河北保定;

发布时间: 2024-09-22 总浏览量: 222

摘要

目的 分析胃镜下氩离子凝固术与胃镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃息肉患者的效果。方法 选取2022年1月至2023年1月于我院进行治疗的胃息肉患者80例,将其随机分为试验组与参照组,每组各40例,予参照组胃镜下黏膜切除术,予试验组胃镜下氩离子凝固术,比较临床疗效。结果 试验组患者的临床治疗有效率为明显更高,并且试验组患者的术中出血量明显更少、手术时间与住院时间明显更短、并发症发生率明显更低,(P<0.05)具有统计学意义。结论 采用胃镜下氩离子凝固术治疗胃息肉患者,临床疗效显著,不仅能显著改善治疗相关指标,还能明显降低并发症发生率,安全性较高,值得临床推广。

关键词: 胃镜下氩离子凝固术;胃镜下黏膜切除术;胃息肉;临床疗效;并发症

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of argon plasma coagulation and mucosal resection under gastroscopy in treating patients with gastric polyps. Method: 80 patients with gastric polyps treated in our hospital from January 2022 to January 2023 were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 40 patients in each group. The control group underwent mucosal resection under gastroscopy, while the experimental group underwent argon ion coagulation under gastroscopy. The clinical efficacy was compared. Result: The clinical treatment effectiveness rate of the experimental group patients was significantly higher, and the intraoperative bleeding volume of the experimental group patients was significantly less, the operation time and hospitalization time were significantly shorter, and the incidence of complications was significantly lower, with statistical significance (P<0.05).
Conclusion  : The use of argon ion coagulation under gastroscopy for the treatment of gastric polyps patients has significant clinical efficacy, not only significantly improving treatment related indicators, but also significantly reducing the incidence of complications. It has high safety and is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Endoscopic argon ion coagulation surgery; Gastroscopy mucosal resection surgery; Gastric polyps; Clinical efficacy; complication

参考文献 References

[1] 黄鹏. 胃镜下氩离子凝固术与胃镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃息肉患者的效果比较[J]. 中国民康医学,2022, 34(2): 153-155,159. 

[2] 姜红建,韩文良,李小环,等. 胃镜下氩离子凝固术与胃镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃息肉临床疗效比较[J]. 新乡医学院学报,2021,38(2):166-168. 

[3] 董桂君,巨森. 比较研究胃镜下氩离子凝固术、胃镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃息肉临床疗效[J]. 康颐,2022(13):34-36. 

[4] 王文斌,蒋丰娟. 胃镜下氩离子凝固术与黏膜切除术治疗胃息肉的临床疗效比较[J]. 现代医学与健康研究(电子版),2022,6(15):67-70.

[5] 支丽丽. 胃镜下氩离子凝固术治疗胃息肉的临床效果及安全性[J]. 现代养生(上半月版),2022,22(6):867-869. 

[6] 沈思凤. 胃镜下氩离子凝固术(APC)治疗胃息肉的疗效观察及心理护理[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2023,23(74):6-11. 

[7] 林燕华,黄文峰,余中贵.等.内镜下氩离子凝固术治疗胃息肉的临床疗效观察 [J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志 , 2019, 29(6): 153-154.

[8] 罗海深 , 陈艺 , 林坚雄 . 内镜下氩离子凝固术与高频电切术治疗胃息肉患者临床效果观察 [J]. 包头医学院学报 , 2020, 36(9):52-55.

引用本文

孙磊, 胃镜下氩离子凝固术与胃镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃息肉患者的效果比较[J]. 国际临床研究杂志, 2024; 8: (9) : 84-86.