Comparison of interlocking intramedullary nailing and external fixation in the treatment of limb fractures
交锁髓内钉与外固定支架治疗四肢骨折的对比

摘要

目的 对比交锁髓内钉与外固定支架治疗四肢骨折的效果。方法 选取2022年1月-2022年12月期间我院收治的四肢骨折患者60例，按照数字随机法分为对照组（30例，进行外固定支架治疗）和观察组（30例，进行交锁髓内钉治疗）。对比两组治疗后的骨折愈合时间和并发症发生率。结果 观察组的骨折愈合时间明显短于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（p＜0.05）；观察组的并发症发生率时间明显低于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（p＜0.05）。结论 交锁髓内钉相较于外固定支架对四肢骨折患者的治疗效果更好，能够有效地缩短患者的骨折愈合时间，并发症发生率较低，值得临床实践应用。

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of interlocking intramedullary nailing and external fixation in the treatment of limb fracture.
Methods A total of 60 patients with limb fracture admitted to our hospital during 2022.1-2022.12 were selected and divided into control group (30 cases, external fixation stent treatment) and observation group (30 cases, interlocking intramedullary nailing treatment) according to numerical random method. The fracture healing time and complication rate were compared between the two groups.
Results The fracture healing time in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Conclusion   Interlocking intramedullary nailing is more effective than external fixation in the treatment of patients with limb fractures, and can effectively shorten the fracture healing time of patients with lower complication rate, which is worthy of clinical practice.