摘要
目的 比较析环泊酚与丙泊酚在门诊手术中的应用效果。方法 选取2021年1月至2023年4月期间于我院进行妇科、消化内镜门诊手术患者200例为研究对象，随机将其分为2组（丙泊酚组与环泊分组），每组各100例，比较环泊酚麻醉及丙泊酚麻醉在门诊检查与治疗中的注射痛、一次用药维持时间、体动反应及术后宿醉情况。结果 环泊酚组麻药注射痛、体动反应发生率小于丙泊酚组，组间数据有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；环泊酚一次用药维持时间稍长于丙泊酚，组间数据有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组术后的宿醉情况并无统计学差异， P＞0.05。结论 在门诊手术中，环泊酚无明显注射痛，体动反应发生低，麻醉效果良好，值得临床推广应用。
关键词： 环泊酚；丙泊酚；门诊手术；应用
Abstract
Objective To compare and analyze the application effects of cyclophenol and propofol in outpatient surgery. Methods A total of 200 patients who underwent gynecological and digestive endoscopy outpatient surgeries in our hospital from January 2021 to April 2023 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into two groups (propofol group and ciprofloxacin group), with 100 patients in each group. The injection pain, maintenance time of one medication, body reaction, and postoperative hangover of ciprofloxacin anesthesia and propofol anesthesia during outpatient examination and treatment were compared. Results The incidence of anesthesia injection pain and body movement reactions in the cyclophenol group was lower than that in the propofol group, and the data between the groups showed statistical significance (P<0.05); The maintenance time of one dose of cyclophenol was slightly longer than that of propofol, and the inter group data showed statistical significance (P<0.05); There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative hangover between the two groups, P>0.05. Conclusion In outpatient surgeries, there is no obvious injection pain of cyclophorol, and the occurrence of body movement reactions is low. The anesthesia effect is good, and it is worth promoting and applying in clinical practice.
Key words： Cyclophenol; Propofol; Outpatient surgery; Application
参考文献 References
[1] 向玲,陈星曲,杨丽,等.环泊酚与丙泊酚在无痛胃镜诊疗中的应用效果观察[J].实用医院临床杂志,2023,20(03): 109-113.
[2] 张笑,杜海云,钱斌.环泊酚用于宫腔镜手术镇静的有效性及安全性：随机对照试验[J].徐州医科大学学报,2023, 43(03):185-188.
[3] 王如,蔺祎,王益敏,等.环泊酚与丙泊酚用于日间宫腔镜手术的麻醉效果比较[J].广东医学,2023,44(02):188-193.
[4] 郝迎春,曹惠鹃,孙莹杰,等.环泊酚与丙泊酚用于宫腔镜手术的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2023,39(01):106-108.
[5] 贾畅,曹惠鹃,孙莹杰,等.丙泊酚与环泊酚分别复合羟考酮对人流术麻醉效果的随机对照研究[J].实用药物与临床,2022,25(11):1012-1015.
[6] 黄凤南, 崔珊珊, 夏中元, et al. 环泊酚单药与丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼在无痛胃镜检查中的应用效果比较 [J]. 山东医药, 2022, (026): 062.
[7] "环泊酚临床应用指导意见"专家小组, 刘进, 王东信, et al. 环泊酚临床应用指导意见 [J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2021, 41(2): 4.
[8] 易强林, 莫怀忠, 胡慧, et al. 环泊酚与丙泊酚在老年患者无痛胃镜检查中的比较 [J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022, 38(7): 4
[9] AHMED F, DUBEY P K, AKHILESHWAR. The Valsalva Maneuver Is Not as Effective as Lidocaine for the Attenuation of Pain on Injection of Propofol: A Randomized Controlled Study [J]. Cureus, 2022, 14(6): e25678.
[10] EUASOBHON P, DEJ-ARKOM S, SIRIUSSAWAKUL A, et al. Lidocaine for reducing propofol-induced pain on induction of anaesthesia in adults [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016, 2(2): Cd007874.
[11] MINOGUE S C, SUN D A. Bacteriostatic saline containing benzyl alcohol decreases the pain associated with the injection of propofol [J]. Anesth Analg, 2005, 100(3): 683-6.